| home archive search downloads subscription contacts |
 | |||||||||
Protests Planned Against Belarus Nuclear PlantPlans are underway for the annual Chernobyl Path March in Minsk on April 26, but this year they will be accompanied by similar demonstrations in the contaminated zone and in Astravets, the location chosen earlier this year for the construction of a new nuclear power plant in Belarus.Earlier, two sites in Mahilou region appeared to be the favored locations for the station, but evidently they were rejected because one suffered from unstable soil conditions and the other might have "tectonic faults." An equally viable reason -that the Mahilou region is within the zone contaminated by the 1986 nuclear disaster at Chernobyl, was not discussed. In turn, a widespread criticism of the Astravets site, that it suffered a 7.0 magnitude earthquake in 1907, was dismissed by an expert from the prospecting company Belhealohiya (Belarus Geology), Volha Boyeva, who said that the proposed location is some 15 miles to the north of the rupture (Belapan, March 12). In December 2008, the decision to use the Astravets site was announced by First Deputy Premier Uladzimie Syamashka, who said that work on the construction of houses for the builders would commence on January 19, 2009 and on the plant itself two days later. The station is to be a third generation water-pressurized plant, which is usually referred to by its Russian acronym VVER (www.charter97.org, Dec 19). The current site is close to the villages of Mikhalishki and Hoza in Hrodna region, near the Lithuanian border and only 20 miles from the capital Vilnius. As news about the new location circulated last November, a steering committee was formed to create a public initiative entitled "The Astravets Nuclear Power Plant is a Crime" (ANPPC), headed by two locals, Ivan Kruk and Mikalai Ulasevich. They were reportedly refused permission to hold a public meeting in Astravets cinema and concert hall. Instead, on March 3, local officials held a partially closed meeting with experts, doctors, state officials, and media called "Construction of the Nuclear Power Plant in the Republic of Belarus -Security and Reliability," and opponents were not permitted to voice their opinions (Vyasna, April 9). In mid-April, Ulasevich held a press conference in Minsk, at which he declared that the building of the station was not a civic decision, but rather a military-political one. He stated also that local authorities recently searched his apartment, as well as those of other activists opposing the construction, (Vyasna, April 14). According to one source, the district authorities sent out bogus leaflets on behalf of the "United Gay Party" purporting to come from ANPCC, ostensibly in the belief that such an agency would be universally condemned by the public (Bellona, March 16). A protest was also held in the city of Salihorsk by several young men, who posed as mutants and handed out literature, alongside a poster with the slogan "No to new Chernobyls" (www.charter97.org, April 15). President Alyaksandr Lukashenka has the final decision on both the location and acceptance of the project. Despite the current financial difficulties facing Belarus, and the daunting costs of completing the station estimated at 4.5 to 5 billion Euros (Narodnaya Volya, April 15), it is to go ahead as planned. It will comprise two 1,000-megawatt reactors in its first phase scheduled for completion by 2016 (reactor one) and 2018 (reactor two), Lukashenka remarked that Russia was prepared to issue its neighbor a loan for the project and referred to a recent opinion poll of the Institute of Sociology that revealed that 60 percent of Belarusians support the project (Belarusian Telegraph Agency, April 7). The actual figure was 54.8 percent (www.minenergo.gov.by, Dec 20). According to the Belarusian Ministry of Energy, the country will sign an agreement with Russia for the joint construction of the Astravets station, but it is plausible that a foreign engineering company will be employed to draw up the details (Belarusian Telegraph Agency, April 13). Russian ambassador to Belarus, Aleksandr Surikov, in a recent interview with the news agency Belapan, stated that Russia supports the idea of the station, and he also remarked that there would be an opportunity to expand the plant beyond its initial size (Narodnaya Volya, April 15). The plans are causing some anxiety in several quarters. Lithuania's Foreign Minister, Vigaudas Ushatskas, expressed concern that the plant was so close to the border with his country (Bellona, March 16). Lithuania's Ignalina nuclear plant, which is a graphite-moderated RBMK, is slowly being phased out, while the location is in an environmentally clean zone close to several nature reserves. The third issue is the projected costs and Belarus' inability to pay them. In essence, the project will be almost entirely Russian in operation, including fuel and reactors, as well as potential ownership if the loans are ever recalled. It would add to the Russian economic interventions in Belarus, which include the project "Minsk City" at a cost of $4.5 billion and the presence of subsidiaries of seven Russian banks (Narodnaya Volya, April 15). Finally, there is a more general problem of resorting to nuclear power in the country most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. About one fifth of Belarus' residents inhabit areas contaminated by that accident, but the government has adamantly maintained that the land is safe to cultivate. The new project in Astravets has given new significance to the Chernobyl anniversary in Belarus. This article appeared in Belarusian Review, Vol. 21, No. 2 --------------------------------------------- Copyright 2009 Belarusian Review All rights reserved. belarusianreview@hotmailcom
Dr..David Marples
|
|||||||||
| Rubriques |
Belarusian Culture
Belarusians Abroad
Contents
Economy
Editorial
Features
Chronicle of Events
Legacy of Chernobyl
Letters
Media Watch
News Briefs
- Culture & Society
- Freedom of Religion
- Independent Media
- Belarus & the World
- Human Rights
- Politics - Opposition
- Politics - Regime
Thoughts and Observations
| New Articles |
| Declaration by the Coordinating Committee of Belarusians of Canada (23.01.2011) |
| Belarus Police Arrest Opposition Leaders (23.01.2011) |
| The Center for Belarusian Studies (23.01.2011) |
| A backfire in Belarus (23.01.2011) |
| Wrong Carrot, Wrong Stick (23.01.2011) |
| StatementBy the Office for a Democratic Belarus (Brussels) And the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (23.01.2011) |
| A Nasty Surprise in Belarus (23.01.2011) |
| Blood and Special Operations in Belarus Politics (23.01.2011) |
| Demonstration in London (23.01.2011) |
| Statement By the Rada of The Belarusian Democratic Republic in Exile 28th December 2010 (23.01.2011) |
| STATEMENT (23.01.2011) |
| Belarus: That’s enough democracy (23.01.2011) |
| In Belarus, a Slide Toward Eastern Aggression (23.01.2011) |
| Opinion - The EU Has no Choice But to Continue Dialogue With Belarus (23.01.2011) |
| No Business as Usual (23.01.2011) |
| Readers' Favorites |
| Belarusian Weapons Exports:A Possible Source of Laundered Funds? (15622) |
| The Exchange Rate Policy for Belarus (15490) |
| Kitabs, the Unique Phenomenon of the Belarusian Language in "Encyclopedia of the Belarusian language" (15468) |
| Belarusica at the AAASS Convention (14472) |
| Vaclav Havel - in Defense of Jakub Kolas Humanities Lyceum (14412) |
| Putin Doctrine: Immediate Threat to Belarus (14015) |
| Belarusian Currency: Problems and Perspectives (13878) |
| Is Lukashenka Winning Back Hearts and Minds? (13533) |
| DZIADY and Kurapaty Unite the Opposition (13181) |
| Belarus Represented in the World Book Fair (13175) |
| Minsk Wants Compensation from Moscow for Abandoning National Currency (13169) |
| Opposition Forms New Pro-European Alliance (13016) |
| The Sad State of Agriculture (12633) |
| EU Aid Misuse Fears (12150) |
| The Third Wave, or the regimes current tactics in dealing with independent NGOs (11740) |